.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Monday, May 9, 2011

robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover

robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Actor, Robert Pattinson tosses
  • Actor, Robert Pattinson tosses



  • Mattie Num Nums
    Mar 31, 02:40 PM
    I have 2 friends with android, one with an HTC and one with Samsung Galaxy S.

    They have different OS versions since they aren't able to update it, they get crap bugs and error in almost every software they use. I say to one of them to update to lastest version, he told me he can't because he need to do it from "root"... i don't know, but at least i was able to install WhatsApp on their phones, the only thing i care :-P Naturally they are suing their device at minimum, one of them neither have 3G connection. When we are at pub, they all use my iPhone for browsing and gaming (sigh) as always has been.

    The issue with that each company skins the phone differently. The issue is not with Android the issue is with the Manufacturers such as HTC and Samsung not releasing their updates when Android does. It shouldn't take more than a few weeks to port HTC Sense to Android 2.3 when it is released.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Twilight heartthrob Robert
  • Twilight heartthrob Robert



  • j-traxx
    Apr 8, 06:02 AM
    Why anyone would ever choose to buy an Apple product at Best Buy over the Apple Store is beyond me. :confused:

    no apple stores in the state of south dakota. but we got bb





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. robert pattinson vanity fair
  • robert pattinson vanity fair



  • Bill McEnaney
    Apr 29, 12:47 PM
    So what? Who said liberals never partake in name calling? You claimed that liberals do more name calling. You want me to go dig out examples of name-calling done by conservative voices such as Limbaugh, Beck, etc.?
    Please do dig them out. It's only fair that you should be free to point out point out evil that some conservatives do publicly. Meanwhile, let's see whether this (http://www.mrc.org/Profiles/odonnell/welcome.asp) link works now.

    RT, did you notice that I said that whomever does it, name-calling is libel or slander?





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Reveals
  • Robert Pattinson Reveals



  • Mac Kiwi
    Jul 21, 07:24 AM
    I've already got one. A SuperMac C500 to be precise! (Well, actually it's an Apus 2000, but in the US it was the C500).

    SuperMac was the brandname UMAX used for thier Mac clones. Check out
    http://home.earthlink.net/~supermac_insider/

    :)



    Ok SuperMac is definitely out then :)





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. The cover is for the April
  • The cover is for the April



  • gnasher729
    Aug 26, 04:08 PM
    I dont see much change really, the 1.66GHz merom chip will find its way into the mini (they'll scrap the solo model).

    The 1.83 & 2.00GHz for iMacs (if they use merom) and MacBooks and the 2.16 and 2.33 for the 15 & 17 MBPs respectively. Its that simple.

    Only problem with that is that a 2.33 GHz Merom chip will be fifty percent more expensive than a 2.16 GHz Yonah is today. So do you think Apple will increase prices of the MacBook Pro by $150 to $200 or reduce their profit?





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair
  • Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair



  • rickjs
    Apr 6, 03:15 PM
    people will buy a xoom just because its not made by apple.

    EXACTLY! But it doesn't make the Xoom or the iPad 2 any less of a great product. I advice everyone who gets a chance to use it. Actually use the Xoom and see it's not so bad. I really think many of you guys are just hating on it because it's not an apple product so it obviously can't compare. -_-





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Set for
  • Robert Pattinson Set for



  • gorgeousninja
    Apr 19, 04:36 PM
    How can this be that 'Apple have a pretty strong case' when so many posters have said that whatever Apple does is generic, and that they have never designed or innovated anything?...

    Oh! Ding!!

    Must be cos they are all talking cr*p....





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Rob#39;s Italian Vanity Fair
  • Rob#39;s Italian Vanity Fair



  • Michaelgtrusa
    Apr 8, 01:59 AM
    It depends on the store your at, some BestBuy's have poor management, some don't.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair
  • Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair



  • Machead III
    Sep 19, 09:27 AM
    I hope that the MacBook with Core 2 Duo is better than the Core Duo version :)

    I hope it's worse?





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson for Vanity
  • Robert Pattinson for Vanity



  • TheKrillr
    Aug 26, 11:33 PM
    Expect new Merom-based macs, and a new iPod, on September 18th.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. robert pattinson vanity fair
  • robert pattinson vanity fair



  • osofast240sx
    Apr 8, 07:56 AM
    I work at Best Buy, and I can tell you this "rumor" is not true.

    First, we do not have daily quotas on iPad sales, although we do have overall budget goals as any company would. iPads had no impact on this.

    iPad 2's have been extremely hard to keep in stock, and at least for my store and all the stores in my region, they would sell out within hours of receiving a pretty good sized shipment. (Although the Verizon ones dont sell as well as others, they still sell out too) We did not hold anything back... do you think we like the hundreds of calls and dozens of people asking us if we have any in stock? We took care of every customer we could. In checking inventory levels at other stores, it was zero's all the way down the list.

    We are experiencing inventory issues with the iPad. Be it simple unexpected demand, the earthquake in Japan, or Apple wanting to take care of customers through their website and retail store before big box stores... I dont know. But stores certainly are not sitting on them.what you(Best Buy) did was take $100 from the customer and lock them in from buying anywere else!





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. April#39;s cover story, “Escape
  • April#39;s cover story, “Escape



  • HecubusPro
    Sep 19, 08:25 AM
    Well, the store's not down. My theory that an update would happen today looks to be bunk. Couple with this story, and I have no idea what to think now. I'm completely perplexed. Oh well, I guess we'll just see what happens at Photokina.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson covers Vanity
  • Robert Pattinson covers Vanity



  • Multimedia
    Jul 21, 12:51 PM
    All I will say is that you are not a typical user. You are not even close to typical.

    OK. So maybe you need ten thousand cores and three million gigabytes of RAM. Don't think for an instant that the majority of the world shares your requirements.I may not be typical today, but in future a majority of Western Pop-Culture type users - not the world - will want to be able to archive HDTV to mp4 off their original recordings in a flash and only more cores will solve that problem.

    And I never said anything about needing ten thousand cores etc. I think it is quite realistic for the majority of Western Pop-Culture Type Nationalities ONLY users to need 16 or more cores by 2010. Thank God we will begin to get them by 2008. :eek:

    I don't begin to pretend we are discussing the world's users' needs here. Only Westerners with heavy Pop-Culture Multimedia type usage - Video iPods HDTV Sat Radio etc.

    I believe that there is a fundamental lack of imagination on this front - because it hasn't been possible to date, therefore it isn't in the consciousness of many users yet as a possibility they would think of doing. It's not so much that I'm atypical as it is I am already thinking outside the box of how we've been doing stuff to date. Soon many will begin to see the new ways we will be able to get stuff done faster thanks to more Cores inside.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson#39;s HOT Vanity
  • Robert Pattinson#39;s HOT Vanity



  • Burnsey
    Mar 19, 12:59 PM
    When will you people realize that Obama is not in charge? You're not in charge either. Corporate interest rules the USA, Libya has 2% of the world's oil supply and a lot of companies have interests there. No one intervened militarily in Rwanda or East Timor. You guys can continue to have your little left vs right, conservative vs. liberal distraction of a debate, meanwhile the real people running the show don't give a rat's ass about any of it.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Vanity Fair
  • Vanity Fair



  • Sydde
    Mar 18, 02:07 AM
    We can totally fix the deficit just by taxing the catholic church alone...

    Probably not, but it would help a lot. Especially if we could tax them at unearned income rates. I say we should do it. Religious leaders are the source of a great many of this world's problem, it is time we charge them for the cleanup.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair
  • Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair



  • miketcool
    Aug 11, 06:38 PM
    You all must realize now that the touch screen scroll wheel is for the iPhone, not, the iPod. You wont watch video's on your phone, but youll listen to audio, dial numbers and store info. The Video player will be a spin off and be video oriented, this will be mobile oriented. $399, I'd still buy a mobile hub with music and phone capabilities.

    It Cometh.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair
  • Robert Pattinson Vanity Fair



  • AwakenedLands
    Mar 31, 06:46 PM
    I bet they tried, but it didn't work well. They're just feigning ignorance. As they themselves said, they cut corners. I read this as they didn't optimize the software-- it's probably very processor and RAM intensive. Just speculation though.

    That's just MORE reason to open source it. Cutting corners is the one thing Apple generally doesn't do (or they spin it perfectly). If Google cut corners on Honeycomb to meet some "deadline", that's one thing that could benefit from a community of free coders willing to code for Android.

    To me it sounds like there is a flaw with Honeycomb that is pretty serious, but they need to make it available for phones as soon as they can to keep up with Apple. Once fix it becomes open.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson Covers Vanity
  • Robert Pattinson Covers Vanity



  • SuperMatt
    Mar 31, 02:26 PM
    The biggest advantage always given for Android over iOS is that it's "open source." Well, clearly that's not the case anymore. So, I can't think of any other reason to use Android over iOS, or even Windows 7. It looks like junk, and it's just a cheap ripoff of iOS.





    robert pattinson vanity fair 2011 cover. Robert Pattinson: Vanity Fair
  • Robert Pattinson: Vanity Fair



  • Cinch
    Aug 11, 11:35 AM
    Take a look at the Nokia E61. I just got one to replace my BlackBerry and love it. It's the European version and you have to buy it unlocked ($350 or so) but it works great. Cingular is coming out with a dumbed down version called the E62 but strips away some of the cool features like WiFi. Go figure - an American phone with less features than the one sold in the rest of the world.

    With crappy phones and our pathetic broadband infrastructure, you'd think we were Third World rather than a "Superpower."


    Yeah, but I rather pay ~30% tax than the 50%+ tax in Europe (fed., state, sales etc).





    michaelflynn
    Apr 6, 02:53 PM
    Constant crashes on a Windows machine, eh? I don't see that from feedback I've been hearing. I'm wondering about the specs of those Windows machines you are speaking of (unsupported video card, or not enough RAM perhaps?). Drop by our forum with your issues. Let's see if we can help you troubleshoot your issues: http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/premierepro_current

    Yes, many of the crashes I've experienced have to do with Matrox cards, but not all of them. My boss is on the Abode and Matrox beta teams, so I will let him deal with the feedback. I think the machines are primarily i7's with 8+GB RAM on Windows 7 64-bit...I don't know for sure though, I'm not well versed in Windows based machines.





    dicklacara
    Apr 10, 04:24 AM
    I'm not so sure about the down res option, it sounds like an awful lot of time spent compressing, though I sure hope it is some type of interface, perhaps as an input device or palette.

    iOS 4.3 apparently contains private frameworks for all the ProRes codecs.

    I hope we also will see a way to use an iPad as a control surface for some FC operations -- pinch/zoom for example or dragging audio sliders...





    AppleKrate
    Sep 19, 11:14 AM
    - 2 CPU cores compared to 1 CPU core
    - Radically greater FSB bandwidth
    - PC2-5300 DDR2 memory compared to PC2-4200 DDR2
    - PCIe 16x for graphics controller compared to AGP 8x
    - Improved graphics controller with more VRAM
    - Dedicated 1.5 Gbps SATA for hard disk compared to UATA-100
    - ExpressCard/34 (has PCIe 1x and USB 2.0) compared to CardBus
    - MagSafe power connector
    - Built-in iSight camera
    - etc.

    ok, thanks :o
    ps I want more :D





    H. Flower
    Apr 12, 11:45 AM
    "grue likes this"

    Good call on the "insufficient content" / transition split errors, those drive me right to the edge of madness sometimes.

    Another one: TRUTHFUL !*@(#(!@#!@ ERROR MESSAGES!

    Another one: Let's say I want to export a marked clip from my timeline and I call it "Hurf", and then go "Oh whoops I meant to mark that out point 8 frames later", I want to replace "Hurf" but I can't because the program is dumb and says the file is in use. So I have to go to the file location and delete the incorrect-made file, or give it a diff name and THEN delete the original.



    ahhh.....Bane of my existence. Not an issue with After Effects and its annoying as hell!





    brianus
    Sep 15, 12:26 PM
    No, that is not true, in fact it couldn't be more untrue. Now, the 95 family (95/98/ME) was a totally different codebase. But with the NT family (NT/2000/XP) the client and the server were identical, even identical in distributed code. In fact there was a big scandal years ago where someone discovered the registry setting where you could turn NT Workstation into NT Server. Back then all that was different was the number of outbound IP connections and possibly the number of CPUs supported. All they were trying to do with Workstation was prevent you from using it as a server (thus the outbound IP limit) and at some point they didn't give you full-blown IIS on Workstation. That's it.

    Dude, how many times do I have to repeat myself before you myopic '90s-era IT geeks understand me? I was referring to the difference between Windows 9x and Windows NT. I neither knew, nor care, that there were different versions of NT itself. For. Christ's. Sake. I have said this three times now. Don't make me come over there.


    On an unrelated note, wouldnt it been cool to effectivly install a whole OS on RAM. That would be noticably quicker....

    I keep hearing about speculation that they'll start using NAND flash to help with startup times in laptops, things like that -- now, how would that work? Doesn't everything have to be on the boot volume? OS's seem to assume these days that the OS, programs and user directories are all going to be on one volume and you have to be kind of technically literate to do it differently..